An effective RFI template should contain 8 core components including project context, current state assessment, vendor qualification questions, and capability-specific inquiries, typically limiting questions to 15-25 substantive items. Organizations that skip the RFI phase and jump directly to RFPs often discover their requirements were unrealistic or miss crucial vendor categories entirely. The RFI serves as intelligence gathering at the beginning of procurement, helping teams enter formal vendor selection with clearer requirements and realistic expectations.
Building an effective RFI template requires focusing on specificity in scope definition, structured question frameworks, and clear evaluation criteria. Here's how to build an RFI template that actually works.
A Request for Information (RFI) sits at the beginning of the procurement cycle—before you're ready to request formal proposals or price quotes. The purpose is intelligence gathering, not vendor selection. Organizations that use structured RFIs can enter the formal procurement phase with clearer requirements and more realistic expectations.
Here's what distinguishes RFIs from other procurement documents:
Many teams skip the RFI phase entirely, jumping straight to RFPs. This can backfire when teams spend significant time evaluating RFP responses, only to realize their requirements were unrealistic or that they missed a crucial vendor category entirely.
For more context on how RFIs fit into the broader procurement process, see our guide on strategic procurement workflows.
Here are the eight sections that generate the most useful vendor responses:
Don't just describe what you need—explain why you need it. Vendors provide better responses when they understand your constraints and goals.
Example of weak context:
"We need a new CRM system."
Example of strong context:
"We're a 200-person B2B SaaS company currently using spreadsheets to track 1,500 active enterprise opportunities across a 9-month sales cycle. Our pipeline visibility breaks down after initial contact, causing a 34% drop-off rate between demo and close. We need to understand what modern CRM architectures can handle complex deal cycles with multiple stakeholders."
Include 3-5 bullet points about your existing setup, team size, and key pain points. This helps vendors self-qualify and saves everyone time.
Example structure:
These questions help you quickly filter vendors before investing time in detailed evaluations. We recommend 5-8 binary or short-answer questions:
At Arphie, front-loading qualification questions in your RFI template helps eliminate unsuitable vendors before you invest in detailed conversations.
This is where you dig into functional requirements without the full detail of an RFP. Structure questions by user workflow or business process.
Framework that works well:
"Describe your approach to [specific workflow]. Include:
- Key features that support this workflow
- Typical configuration or customization required
- Common integration points
- Limitations or scenarios where this doesn't work well"
The last bullet point—asking about limitations—is critical. Vendors who honestly describe trade-offs are usually more reliable partners than those who claim their solution does everything perfectly.
For any software or technology RFI, include questions about:
Organizations implementing AI-powered automation platforms particularly need to understand how vendor systems expose data for model training and integration workflows.
Ask vendors to outline their typical implementation process, including:
In an RFI, you're not asking for firm quotes—you want to understand the pricing model so you can budget appropriately.
Useful questions include:
Request 2-3 relevant customer references with:
The vendors you invite to respond determine the quality of information you'll gather. Here's a three-tier approach:
Tier 1 - Known Quantities (2-3 vendors):
Established players you've already researched. These responses set your baseline for capabilities and pricing.
Tier 2 - Emerging Alternatives (2-4 vendors):
Newer or mid-market vendors that might offer better value or innovation. These responses often reveal capabilities you hadn't considered.
Tier 3 - Wildcards (1-2 vendors):
Non-obvious solutions from adjacent markets or different approaches to solving your problem. These responses challenge your assumptions about requirements.
For complex procurements, allow 10-15 business days for vendor responses. For simpler RFIs, 5-7 days is reasonable.
Create a simple scoring rubric before you distribute your RFI. This prevents "analysis paralysis" when responses come back.
Sample scoring approach:
Involve 2-3 stakeholders in evaluation to balance perspectives. Best results typically come with one technical evaluator, one business owner, and one procurement or operations representative.
Modern AI-native platforms can analyze vendor responses against your requirements, flagging gaps and highlighting differentiators. This is particularly valuable when you receive 6+ responses.
At Arphie, customers use AI to:
This reduces RFI evaluation time while improving consistency.
The mistake: Including 50+ detailed questions appropriate for an RFP, not an exploratory RFI.
The fix: Limit your RFI to 15-25 substantive questions. If you need more detail, that signals you're ready for an RFP phase with a shortlist of vendors.
The mistake: "Tell us about your capabilities in [broad category]."
The fix: Provide specific scenarios or workflows you need to support.
Better question structure:
"Our compliance team needs to review and approve 200+ vendor questionnaires per quarter, with an average of 120 questions per questionnaire. 60% of questions repeat across questionnaires. Describe how your platform would help us:
- Reuse approved answers
- Route new questions to subject matter experts
- Track approval status
- Generate audit trails"
This level of specificity generates responses you can actually evaluate.
The mistake: Ending your RFI with "thank you for your response" and no indication of timeline or next steps.
The fix: Include a section titled "Timeline and Next Steps" that specifies:
This professional courtesy significantly improves vendor engagement and response quality.
The mistake: Creating an RFI based on one department's perspective without input from other affected teams.
The fix: Before finalizing your RFI template, conduct a 30-minute review with representatives from:
Companies can reach final negotiations only to have deals collapse because security requirements weren't surfaced until late-stage reviews.
The mistake: Letting vendors respond in any format they choose.
The fix: Specify exactly how you want responses structured. For example:
"Please respond to each question in the numbered order provided. Include the question number and text before your response. Maximum 250 words per response unless otherwise specified. Submit as a single PDF document."
Standardized responses can significantly reduce evaluation time because you can quickly compare vendor answers to the same question.
When evaluating software vendors, prioritize questions about:
For consulting, implementation, or managed services:
For vendors providing physical goods:
You've completed your RFI phase successfully when you can answer these questions:
That last question is crucial. A good RFI process should refine your understanding of what's possible, what's expensive, and what trade-offs you'll need to make.
For guidance on transitioning from RFI to formal proposal requests, explore strategic RFP best practices.
Before sending your RFI, verify:
An effective RFI template isn't just a procurement formality—it's your first strategic interaction with potential vendor partners. The quality of information you gather in the RFI phase directly impacts the success of your eventual vendor selection and implementation.
Investing in better RFI templates upfront can reduce total procurement cycle time. The clarity you create in the RFI phase eliminates confusion, reduces back-and-forth, and helps both your team and potential vendors make efficient decisions about fit.
Start with the template structure outlined here, customize it for your specific needs, and refine it based on the response quality you receive. Over time, you'll develop RFI templates that become valuable strategic assets—capturing institutional knowledge about what questions actually predict vendor success in your environment.
For organizations managing multiple RFIs, RFPs, and other procurement documents simultaneously, modern AI-powered platforms can help you standardize, distribute, and evaluate responses at scale while maintaining the quality and specificity that generates actionable intelligence.
An RFI (Request for Information) is used for exploratory intelligence gathering about vendor capabilities and approaches at the beginning of procurement. An RFP (Request for Proposal) includes detailed requirements with scoring criteria for actual vendor selection. An RFQ (Request for Quote) focuses specifically on pricing for well-defined products or services. The RFI comes first to inform realistic requirements before formal procurement begins.
An effective RFI should contain 15-25 substantive questions maximum. Including 50+ detailed questions is a common mistake that signals you're ready for an RFP phase instead. Start with 5-8 binary qualification questions to help vendors self-select, then include capability-specific questions structured around user workflows or business processes.
Project context should explain why you need the solution, not just what you need. Include specific details like team size, volume metrics, current pain points, and business objectives. For example, rather than stating 'We need a new CRM system,' describe your sales cycle length, pipeline volume, specific breakdown points, and what you need to understand about modern architectures.
Allow 10-15 business days for complex procurements and 5-7 days for simpler RFIs. Include clear timeline and next steps in your RFI document, specifying the response deadline, when vendors can expect initial feedback, and what the planned next phase will be (shortlist calls, RFP, or pilot program).
You're ready to move from RFI to RFP when you can identify the 3-4 core capabilities you must have, understand the realistic budget range based on vendor pricing guidance, have narrowed down to 3-5 qualified vendors for formal evaluation, and have refined your original requirements based on what you learned. A successful RFI process should change your understanding of what's possible and what trade-offs you'll need to make.
Create a scoring rubric before distributing your RFI to prevent analysis paralysis. Weight criteria such as qualification requirements (25%), relevant experience (20%), capability match (30%), implementation feasibility (15%), and pricing alignment (10%). Involve 2-3 stakeholders including a technical evaluator, business owner, and procurement representative to balance perspectives. Require standardized response formats so you can quickly compare vendor answers to the same questions.
Dean Shu is the co-founder and CEO of Arphie, where he's building AI agents that automate enterprise workflows like RFP responses and security questionnaires. A Harvard graduate with experience at Scale AI, McKinsey, and Insight Partners, Dean writes about AI's practical applications in business, the challenges of scaling startups, and the future of enterprise automation.
.png)
